🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an global treaty designed to safeguard women from violence, covering family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters gathered in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the process of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant setback for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary parties supporting the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent decision has sparked widespread outcry both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national petition calling for the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging MPs of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the treaty four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a two-thirds support, the head of state could potentially return the bill for additional consideration if he holds objections.

President Rinkevics stated on social media that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in Latvia but across the continent," stated a human rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple European nations
• The European treaty requires particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable discussions in additional EU countries